Coiley v. Comarco Contractors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coiley v. Comarco Contractors, Inc.

5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 997 (Coiley v. Comarco Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coiley v. Comarco Contractors, Inc., 5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action (1) for a judgment declaring null and void (a) two resolutions adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay by which certain real property abutting appellant’s land in the village of Hieksville was rezoned from residential to business and (b) a special permit granted to respondent Rayeo Holding Corp. to erect thereon a professional building, and (2) for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee, to whom the action was referred to hear and determine, dismissing the [995]*995complaint on tlie merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present —Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action (1) for a judgment declaring null and void (a) two resolutions adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay by which certain real property abutting appellant’s land in the village of Hieksville was rezoned from residential to business and (b) a special permit granted to respondent Rayeo Holding Corp. to erect thereon a professional building, and (2) for other relief, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial before an Official Referee, to whom the action was referred to hear and determine, dismissing the [995]*995complaint on tlie merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present —Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coiley-v-comarco-contractors-inc-nyappdiv-1958.