Coiley v. Butler

170 N.E.2d 902, 8 N.Y.2d 1092
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the grounds that the trial court erred (1) in denying plaintiff full opportunity to impeach the witness Judson on the basis of his prior sworn testimony. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 343-a), and (2) in his conflicting rulings and instructions with respect to intoxication on the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Since a new trial is necessary, we need not discuss the other alleged errors—viz., the improper comments of the Trial Justice and his rulings in permitting cross-examination of plaintiff concerning Mrs. Hollister. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van' Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coiley v. Butler, 170 N.E.2d 902, 8 N.Y.2d 1092 (N.Y. 1960).

170 N.E.2d 902 (Coiley v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. Reynolds
283 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)