Coiley v. Butler

170 N.E.2d 902, 8 N.Y.2d 1092
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 21, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 N.E.2d 902 (Coiley v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coiley v. Butler, 170 N.E.2d 902, 8 N.Y.2d 1092 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the grounds that the trial court erred (1) in denying plaintiff full opportunity to impeach the witness Judson on the basis of his prior sworn testimony. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 343-a), and (2) in his conflicting rulings and instructions with respect to intoxication on the issue of plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Since a new trial is necessary, we need not discuss the other alleged errors—viz., the improper comments of the Trial Justice and his rulings in permitting cross-examination of plaintiff concerning Mrs. Hollister. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van' Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. Reynolds
283 N.E.2d 629 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 N.E.2d 902, 8 N.Y.2d 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coiley-v-butler-ny-1960.