Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad

572 F.2d 650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 27, 1978
DocketNos. 77-1227, 77-1228, 77-1229, 77-1230, 77-1231, 77-1264, 77-1265, 77-1266, 77-1267 and 77-1268
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 F.2d 650 (Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad, 572 F.2d 650 (8th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

HARPER, Senior District Judge.

This is a timely appeal by defendant and intervenor from final judgment on these consolidated cases wherein the District Court entered judgment for the plaintiffs under the Vietnam Era Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et seq.

The facts, the issues and the basis of the decision are fully stated in Judge Denney’s well-reasoned opinion in Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 427 F.Supp. 717 (D.Neb.1977).

Our examination of records and briefs satisfies us that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not induced by any erroneous view of the law. In addition to the cases relied on by the District Judge to support his opinion, the case of Alabama Power Company v. Davis, 431 U.S. 581, 97 S.Ct. 2002, 52 L.Ed.2d 595 (1977), supports the judgment of the District Court.

We affirm on the basis of the trial court’s reported opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
572 F.2d 650 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 F.2d 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-v-union-pacific-railroad-ca8-1978.