Cohn v. Trade Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohn v. Trade Bank

240 A.D. 966

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 966 (Cohn v. Trade Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohn v. Trade Bank, 240 A.D. 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

[967]*967Determination modified by granting a new trial, and as so modified affirmed, with costs in all courts to abide the event. The indorsement “ for deposit ” by plaintiff’s assignor was sufficient to restrict further negotiation of the check as held by the Appellate Term. The defendant, however, is entitled to an opportunity to present any defense which it may have affecting either the merits of the claim or the extent of plaintiff’s damage. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, Townley and Glennon, JJ. [146 Misc. 771.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[967]*967Determination modified by granting a new trial, and as so modified affirmed, with costs in all courts to abide the event. The indorsement “ for deposit ” by plaintiff’s assignor was sufficient to restrict further negotiation of the check as held by the Appellate Term. The defendant, however, is entitled to an opportunity to present any defense which it may have affecting either the merits of the claim or the extent of plaintiff’s damage. Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, Townley and Glennon, JJ. [146 Misc. 771.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-v-trade-bank-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack