Cohn v. Northern Real Estate Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Cohn v. Northern Real Estate Co.

157 A. 166, 9 N.J. Misc. 1078, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 149

DecidedOctober 7, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 166 (Cohn v. Northern Real Estate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohn v. Northern Real Estate Co., 157 A. 166, 9 N.J. Misc. 1078, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 149 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oueiam.

The appeal in this case is by the defendant from a judgment rendered against it in the First District Court of Newark.

The action was by the plaintiffs, certified public accountants, for services rendered to the defendant in the preparation of federal tax returns. The defendant admitted the services but contended that at least a portion of them were rendered in pursuance of a written contract which provided that for such portion there should be no charge. The difficulty here is that the alleged contract does not appear to have been offered in evidence, nor is it contained in the state of the case. There is nothing, therefore, before us that would justify a reversal and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oueiam.

The appeal in this case is by the defendant from a judgment rendered against it in the First District Court of Newark.

The action was by the plaintiffs, certified public accountants, for services rendered to the defendant in the preparation of federal tax returns. The defendant admitted the services but contended that at least a portion of them were rendered in pursuance of a written contract which provided that for such portion there should be no charge. The difficulty here is that the alleged contract does not appear to have been offered in evidence, nor is it contained in the state of the case. There is nothing, therefore, before us that would justify a reversal and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 166, 9 N.J. Misc. 1078, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-v-northern-real-estate-co-nj-1931.