Cohn v. Commissioner

Second Circuit

Cohn v. Commissioner

410 F.2d 399

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 22, 1969·No. No. 492, Docket 32618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Taxpayer appeals from an unreported decision of the Tax Court, Arnold Raum, J., which held that the sum of $27,247 received by taxpayer in 1958 was compensation for services as a co-executor rather than a gift. The same issue on substantially the same evidence had been similarly decided in a suit for a refund on behalf of taxpayer’s co-executor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Frank v. United States, 260 F.Supp. 691 (S.D.N.Y.1966). We affirm on the opinion of the Tax Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Taxpayer appeals from an unreported decision of the Tax Court, Arnold Raum, J., which held that the sum of $27,247 received by taxpayer in 1958 was compensation for services as a co-executor rather than a gift. The same issue on substantially the same evidence had been similarly decided in a suit for a refund on behalf of taxpayer’s co-executor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Frank v. United States, 260 F.Supp. 691 (S.D.N.Y.1966). We affirm on the opinion of the Tax Court.

Cohn v. Commissioner, 410 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

410 F.2d 399 (Cohn v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related