Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Cohn & Co. v. Brown

Cohn & Co. v. Brown

66 S.E. 1038, 7 Ga. App. 395, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 315
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 10, 1910
Docket2180
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 66 S.E. 1038 (Cohn & Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohn & Co. v. Brown, 66 S.E. 1038, 7 Ga. App. 395, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 315 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition..

A contract hy which one party agrees to huy and another party agrees to sell the output of the latter’s sawmill during a named year, estimated at a certain designated quantity, is not unilateral or too indefinite for enforcement. Oak City Cooperage Co. v. Kennedy Slave Co., 4 Ga. App. 344 (61 S. E. 499); McCaw Mfg. Co. v. Felder, 115 Ga. 408 (41 S. E. 664).

2. Though the plaintiff may not he entitled to the full amount claimed in his petition, this does not authorize the court to sustain a general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.
135 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Self v. Smith
107 S.E.2d 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Wolf v. Arant
77 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
King v. Tilley
21 S.E.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Mill Wood & Coal Co. v. Flint River Cypress Co.
85 S.E. 943 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E. 1038, 7 Ga. App. 395, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohn-co-v-brown-gactapp-1910.