Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human Resources

588 F. App'x 224
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2014·No. No. 14-1940·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl F. Cohens appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for reconsideration of the court’s orders granting summary judgment for Defendants on her employment discrimination claims. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Cohens does not challenge in her informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition of her motions for reconsideration, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Cohens leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human Resources, 588 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2014).

588 F. App'x 224 (Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human Resources) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.