Cohen v. Wolff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Wolff

254 A.D. 897, 6 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8227

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 897 (Cohen v. Wolff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Wolff, 254 A.D. 897, 6 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

On an application for an order for the examination of plaintiff and two witnesses in an action on two promissory notes, the court limited the examination to the examination of plaintiff upon one of four items in dispute. Special circumstances are presented which render it proper that the deposition of Alfred A. Cohen and Nettie Cohen be taken. Order entered April 22, 1938, modified so as to provide that Alfred A. Cohen be examined as to items 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the notice of motion, and that Nettie Cohen be examined as to item 4 thereof. As so modified, the order, in so far as an appeal is taken, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On an application for an order for the examination of plaintiff and two witnesses in an action on two promissory notes, the court limited the examination to the examination of plaintiff upon one of four items in dispute. Special circumstances are presented which render it proper that the deposition of Alfred A. Cohen and Nettie Cohen be taken. Order entered April 22, 1938, modified so as to provide that Alfred A. Cohen be examined as to items 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the notice of motion, and that Nettie Cohen be examined as to item 4 thereof. As so modified, the order, in so far as an appeal is taken, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 897, 6 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-wolff-nyappdiv-1938.