Cohen v. Weill

33 Misc. 764, 67 N.Y.S. 917
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We see no reason upon the merits of the case to reverse the judgment of the court below. The trial justice, however, erred in allowing to the plaintiff as part of his costs the expenses incurred by the latter, in obtaining the transcript of the stenographer’s minutes which was furnished to the court below. This disbursement amounted to thirty-five dollars and eighty cents. The judgment will, therefore, be modified by deducting this amount therefrom, and as so modified will be affirmed, without costs.

Judgment modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegee.ich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment modified and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Weill, 33 Misc. 764, 67 N.Y.S. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

33 Misc. 764 (Cohen v. Weill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re French
181 A.D. 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Wiener v. Rudinsky
80 Misc. 234 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)