Cohen v. Weekes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Weekes

226 A.D. 770

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent that the appellant be relieved of his purchase and recover the down payment made by him upon the sale. The description of the property contained in the notice of sale was insufficient, as there is property designated on the map in another ward by the same block and lot numbers as the property advertised for sale. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty-, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent that the appellant be relieved of his purchase and recover the down payment made by him upon the sale. The description of the property contained in the notice of sale was insufficient, as there is property designated on the map in another ward by the same block and lot numbers as the property advertised for sale. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty-, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cohen v. Weekes, 226 A.D. 770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

226 A.D. 770 (Cohen v. Weekes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related