Cohen v. Wasserman
242 So. 2d 466, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468
This text of 242 So. 2d 466 (Cohen v. Wasserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cohen v. Wasserman, 242 So. 2d 466, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final judgment denying specific performance entered at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon the basis of the rule stated in Chabot v. Winter Park Co., 34 Fla. 258, 15 So. 756 (1894). See also Restatement of Contracts, § 311 (1932); 17 Am.Jur.2d, Contracts, § 334.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cilabot v. Winter Park Co.
34 Fla. 258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
242 So. 2d 466, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-wasserman-fladistctapp-1971.