Cohen v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 181, 51 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1056, 1983 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1799
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 30, 1983
DocketNo. 182-82T
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2 Cl. Ct. 181 (Cohen v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. United States, 2 Cl. Ct. 181, 51 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1056, 1983 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1799 (cc 1983).

Opinion

ORDER

MAYER, Judge.

In 1981, the United States Tax Court entered judgment against plaintiff for income tax deficiencies in 1975 and 1976 resulting from disallowance of business expenses under Internal Revenue Code § 183(a). Cohen v. Commissioner, No. 6676-80S (Tax Ct. Sept. 3, 1981). See I.R.C. § 7463. These deficiencies have not been satisfied. When plaintiff filed his income tax return for 1981, he reported an overpayment which he requested be refunded. In accordance with section 6402(a) of the Code, the Commissioner applied the overpayment against the unsatisfied tax deficiency from the earlier years. Plaintiff came to this court seeking refund of the overpayment.

This case is now before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to RUSCC 56. Review of the pleadings, affidavit and supporting documents shows that to support his claim for refund plaintiff seeks to relitigate the same issues he raised or could have raised in the Tax Court. This court has no authority to review the judgment of the Tax Court and the decision there is res judicata as to the issues plaintiff seeks to relitigate here. Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 68 S.Ct. 715, 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948); Cooper v. United States, 217 Ct.Cl. 697 (1978); Vait-kus v. United States, No. 266-81T (Ct.Cl. Mar. 12, 1982), 49 A.F.T.R.2d (P-H) 950.

Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the case is dismissed with costs to the prevailing party.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kettle v. United States
104 Fed. Cl. 699 (Federal Claims, 2012)
Hemmings v. Commissioner
104 T.C. No. 9 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Prizer v. United States
11 Cl. Ct. 184 (Court of Claims, 1986)
Yamamoto v. United States
9 Cl. Ct. 207 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Cohen (Joseph) v. u.s.cohen v. United States
727 F.2d 1118 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
Bayshore Resources Co. v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 625 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Lyle v. United States
2 Cl. Ct. 250 (Court of Claims, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cl. Ct. 181, 51 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1056, 1983 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-united-states-cc-1983.