Cohen v. Teak House, Inc.
348 So. 2d 376, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16312
Opinion
The plaintiff urges in his appeal from a summary final judgment that the trial court improperly applied the principle set forth in Carol Management Corporation v. Maxwell Company, 156 So.2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963); and Edelman v. Kolker, 194 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Error has not been shown. See Best v. Barnette, 130 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohen v. Teak House, Inc., 348 So. 2d 376, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
348 So. 2d 376 (Cohen v. Teak House, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best v. Barnette
130 So. 2d 90 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Carol Management Corp. v. Maxwell Co.
156 So. 2d 773 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Edelman ex rel. Mid-States Ins. v. Kolker
194 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)