Cohen v. State
This text of 17 Tex. 142 (Cohen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, who is the appellant ■ in this Court, was indicted for playing at a game called Pin Poole, and convicted. Judgment was rendered against him, from which he appealed.
The only ground that seems to be presented is, whether the proof supported the verdict of the jury. There can be no doubt that it does. It was in proof, that he played at a game that required the Pool played for to be made by the different persons playing for it by putting up a certairi amount of money. It was not in proof that he actually put up money, but it was in proof that he was playing, when the Pool was up. This is proof enough, from which the legitimate conclusion would follow, that he put up Ms money. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Tex. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-state-tex-1856.