Cohen v. State

656 So. 2d 525, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726, 1995 WL 316349
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1995·No. No. 94-429·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for attempted first degree murder with a firearm, burglary of a structure while armed, two counts of robbery with a firearm, three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm, two counts of grand theft auto, evidence tampering, and arson. We are bound, however, to vacate the departure sentences of life imprisonment imposed by the lower court.1 The supreme court has clearly and repeatedly announced that guidelines departure orders must be filed contemporaneously with the announced departure sentence. Blair ¶. State, 598 So.2d 1068 (Fla.1992); State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). The departure order in this case shows that it was prepared and filed ten days later, which plainly violates the supreme court’s requirement. For this reason, we vacate the departure sentences and remand to the lower court to resentenee defendant within the guidelines.

AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED.

PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. State, 656 So. 2d 525, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726, 1995 WL 316349 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 525 (Cohen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. State
688 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Capers v. State
670 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)