Cohen v. Springer Motor Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cohen v. Springer Motor Co.

185 So. 2d 748, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5292

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1966·No. No. 65-630·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action arose out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile struck from the rear by one owned by the defendant. The issue of liability was determined by the court, in favor of the plaintiff. A jury trial on damages resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for "no” dollars. We have considered the several contentions advanced by the plaintiff-appellant, and find them to be without merit. The evidence was in conflict as to whether the plaintiff suffered compensable injuries. We affirm the judgment on authority of White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 176; Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So.2d 641; Raffel v. Magarian, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 249.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action arose out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile struck from the rear by one owned by the defendant. The issue of liability was determined by the court, in favor of the plaintiff. A jury trial on damages resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for "no” dollars. We have considered the several contentions advanced by the plaintiff-appellant, and find them to be without merit. The evidence was in conflict as to whether the plaintiff suffered compensable injuries. We affirm the judgment on authority of White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 176; Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So.2d 641; Raffel v. Magarian, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 249.

Affirmed.

Cohen v. Springer Motor Co., 185 So. 2d 748, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5292 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

185 So. 2d 748 (Cohen v. Springer Motor Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related