Cohen v. Springer Motor Co.
This text of 185 So. 2d 748 (Cohen v. Springer Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action arose out of an automobile accident. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile struck from the rear by one owned by the defendant. The issue of liability was determined by the court, in favor of the plaintiff. A jury trial on damages resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for "no” dollars. We have considered the several contentions advanced by the plaintiff-appellant, and find them to be without merit. The evidence was in conflict as to whether the plaintiff suffered compensable injuries. We affirm the judgment on authority of White v. Acker, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 176; Shaw v. Puleo, Fla.1964, 159 So.2d 641; Raffel v. Magarian, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 249.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 So. 2d 748, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-springer-motor-co-fladistctapp-1966.