Cohen v. Smadar
This text of 247 A.D.2d 505 (Cohen v. Smadar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated November 1, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the wife’s motion to discontinue the action.
Ordered that, the order is affirmed, with costs.
It was not an improvident exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion to grant the wife’s motion to discontinue the divorce action (see, Zuckerman v Zuckerman, 105 AD2d 782).
The husband’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D.2d 505, 668 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-smadar-nyappdiv-1998.