Cohen v. Schwartz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cohen v. Schwartz

829 So. 2d 329, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15678, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2338

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-3057

StatusPublished

This text of 829 So. 2d 329 (Cohen v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Schwartz, 829 So. 2d 329, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15678, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2338 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Cohen appeals an order that authorized the execution of a settlement agreement and supplemental settlement agreement in a Florida estate to which he is a beneficiary entitled to receive an equal one-third distribution. We reverse, pursuant to section 733.602, Florida Statutes (2001), because appellee Gerald Schwartz, the personal representative of the Florida estate, admits that Cohen will not receive an equal share under the settlement agreement.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Cohen appeals an order that authorized the execution of a settlement agreement and supplemental settlement agreement in a Florida estate to which he is a beneficiary entitled to receive an equal one-third distribution. We reverse, pursuant to section 733.602, Florida Statutes (2001), because appellee Gerald Schwartz, the personal representative of the Florida estate, admits that Cohen will not receive an equal share under the settlement agreement.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 So. 2d 329, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15678, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-schwartz-fladistctapp-2002.