Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.

72 F.3d 686, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4, 1996 WL 1211
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 2, 1996
DocketNos. 94-55209, 94-55218
StatusPublished

This text of 72 F.3d 686 (Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp., 72 F.3d 686, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4, 1996 WL 1211 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

Appellants Anthony Maniscalco and Michael Lea, members of a class action brought by Jack Cohen and other employees of Imperial Savings Association against the Resolution Trust Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss their appeals, including their pending petitions for rehearing and a suggestion for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the appellants’ motion is granted. Fed.RApp.P. 42(b).

Under Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1994), we vacate our opinion, 61 F.3d 725 (9th Cir.1995), and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Blair.

APPEAL DISMISSED AND OPINION VACATED. CASE REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blair v. Shanahan
38 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F.3d 686, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4, 1996 WL 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-resolution-trust-corp-ca9-1996.