Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.

72 F.3d 686, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4, 1996 WL 1211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 F.3d 725
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 2, 1996·No. Nos. 94-55209, 94-55218·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellants Anthony Maniscalco and Michael Lea, members of a class action brought by Jack Cohen and other employees of Imperial Savings Association against the Resolution Trust Corporation, filed a motion to dismiss their appeals, including their pending petitions for rehearing and a suggestion for rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the appellants’ motion is granted. Fed.RApp.P. 42(b).

Under Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1994), we vacate our opinion, 61 F.3d 725 (9th Cir.1995), and remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with Blair.

APPEAL DISMISSED AND OPINION VACATED. CASE REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp., 72 F.3d 686, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 50, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4, 1996 WL 1211 (9th Cir. 1996).

72 F.3d 686 (Cohen v. Resolution Trust Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blair v. Shanahan
38 F.3d 1514 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)