Cohen v. Ratner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Ratner

159 A.D. 881, 143 N.Y.S. 1011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D. 881 (Cohen v. Ratner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Ratner, 159 A.D. 881, 143 N.Y.S. 1011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

At the close of the plaintiff’s case he had made out a prima facie case, and there was no evidence presented by the defendants which established any defense. There should, therefore, have been a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

At the close of the plaintiff’s case he had made out a prima facie case, and there was no evidence presented by the defendants which established any defense. There should, therefore, have been a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D. 881, 143 N.Y.S. 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-ratner-nyappdiv-1913.