Cohen v. Quartite Creative Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Quartite Creative Corp.

29 A.D.2d 758, 289 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4534

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 29, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 758 (Cohen v. Quartite Creative Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Quartite Creative Corp., 29 A.D.2d 758, 289 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on November 22, 1967, conditionally granting plaintiff’s motion to preclude, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, without costs or disbursements. The inadequacies in the information furnished — and we find fewer than plaintiff asserts — seem to us more literal than substantial; and in our opinion contain no threat of prejudice to the prosecution of his case. In these circumstances, and in view of the availability of other forms of pretrial discovery (cf. Bawmgarten v. Lear, 26 A D 2d 932), prolonging this debate, with all its minutiae, regarding the sufficiency of particulars lacks practical justification. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on November 22, 1967, conditionally granting plaintiff’s motion to preclude, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, without costs or disbursements. The inadequacies in the information furnished — and we find fewer than plaintiff asserts — seem to us more literal than substantial; and in our opinion contain no threat of prejudice to the prosecution of his case. In these circumstances, and in view of the availability of other forms of pretrial discovery (cf. Bawmgarten v. Lear, 26 A D 2d 932), prolonging this debate, with all its minutiae, regarding the sufficiency of particulars lacks practical justification. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 758, 289 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-quartite-creative-corp-nyappdiv-1968.