Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp.

235 A.D. 811
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 235 A.D. 811 (Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Pyramid Bond & Mortgage Corp., 235 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order in so far as it denies motion to make the complaint more definite and certain and that certain matters be struck out as irrelevant and redundant reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of providing that plaintiff be directed to serve, within twenty days, an amended complaint, omitting therefrom all irrelevant and redundant matter and making it more definite and certain. “ The court should not be compelled to wade through a mass of verbiage and superfluous matter in order to pick out an allegation here and there, which, pieced together * * *, will state a cause of action.” (Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co., Inc., 233 App. Div. 568, 572.) This is a simple action to recover commissions for bringing about the exchange of real property, and the allegations of the complaint should be limited to a plain and concise statement of the material facts * * (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Isaacs v. Salomon, 159 App. Div. 675.) By stipulation the second cause of action is abandoned and it is, therefore, unnecessary to direct plaintiff to state and number separately the causes of action. In so far as the order denies that relief, it is affirmed. In so far as it denies the motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, the order is also affirmed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weissglass v. Weissglass
52 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Intermediate Accounting of Sutter
21 Misc. 2d 577 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
Kasen v. Morrell
10 Misc. 2d 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-pyramid-bond-mortgage-corp-nyappdiv-1932.