Cohen v. Pool

94 A. 37, 84 N.J. Eq. 189, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 378
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 27, 1915·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Pool, 94 A. 37, 84 N.J. Eq. 189, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 378 (N.J. 1915).

94 A. 37 (Cohen v. Pool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.
272 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Grabow v. Gelber
49 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Art Photo v. Kent Parking Garage
37 A.2d 419 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)