Cohen v. New York State Board of Pharmacy

27 A.D.2d 633, 275 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1966·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

In this article 78 proceeding, the petitioner, a supervising pharmacist of a pharmacy owned by nonpharmaeists, seeks review of a determination of the State Board of Pharmacy that he was guilty of certain violations of article 137 of the Education Law (Pharmacy) and imposing a penalty of $100. Even without knowledge a supervising pharmacist fails in his responsibility by not properly performing the duties of his position as we held in Matter of Bernstein v. Allen (26 A D 2d 727) and Matter of Cassell v. Allen (27 A D 2d 597) which mandates confirmation. We find no reason to disturb the finding of the respondent. Determination confirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Aulisi, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. New York State Board of Pharmacy, 27 A.D.2d 633, 275 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

27 A.D.2d 633 (Cohen v. New York State Board of Pharmacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowenberg v. Sobol
191 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Snyder v. Board of Regents of the University
50 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)