Cohen v. MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 194 S.E.2d 867 (Cohen v. MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s sole exception and assignment of error is to the signing of the judgment. In Fishing Pier v. Carolina Beach, 274 N.C. 362, 163 S.E. 2d 363 (1968), in an opinion by Parker, Chief Justice, our Supreme Court said:
“This sole assignment of error to the signing of the judgment presents the face of the record proper for review, *586 but review is limited to the question of whether error of law appears on the face of the record, which includes whether the facts found or admitted support the judgment, and whether the judgment is regular in form. * * * ”
See also Hall v. Board of Elections, 280 N.C. 600, 187 S.E. 2d 52 (1972) and Morris v. Perkins, 11 N.C. App. 152, 180 S.E. 2d 402 (1971), cert. den. 278 N.C. 702.
In the case at bar, we hold that the facts found by the trial court, or admitted, support the judgment, that the judgment is regular in form, and that error does not appear on the face of the record.
The judgment appealed from is
Affirmed;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 S.E.2d 867, 17 N.C. App. 584, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-monumental-life-insurance-company-ncctapp-1973.