Cohen v. Margolin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Margolin

67 A.D.2d 674, 412 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 674 (Cohen v. Margolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Margolin, 67 A.D.2d 674, 412 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 7, 1978, which is in favor of defendant Margolin and against them, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. A jury verdict in favor of a defendant may be set aside when it plainly appears that the evidence so preponderates in favor of the plaintiff that the verdict for the defendant could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence (cf. Busby v Malone, 54 AD2d 572). In our view, the evidence is so overwhelmingly in plaintiffs’ favor that the verdict must be set aside. On the record presented it seems indisputable that the plaintiff husband’s injuries resulted from the respondent’s moving the golf cart without checking to see whether the plaintiff husband was seated. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 7, 1978, which is in favor of defendant Margolin and against them, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. A jury verdict in favor of a defendant may be set aside when it plainly appears that the evidence so preponderates in favor of the plaintiff that the verdict for the defendant could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence (cf. Busby v Malone, 54 AD2d 572). In our view, the evidence is so overwhelmingly in plaintiffs’ favor that the verdict must be set aside. On the record presented it seems indisputable that the plaintiff husband’s injuries resulted from the respondent’s moving the golf cart without checking to see whether the plaintiff husband was seated. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 674, 412 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-margolin-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack