Cohen v. Lundberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Lundberg

133 N.Y.S. 434

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.Y.S. 434 (Cohen v. Lundberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Lundberg, 133 N.Y.S. 434 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complaint in this action was oral and the claim “conversion.” It was conceded upon the trial that, if the plaintiffs were entitled to recover anything, it was the sum of $164.48, for which sum judgment was rendered. An examination of the record discloses that the plaintiffs failed to prove any conversion of the goods received by the defendant, but proved sufficient to enable them under the concession of record to recover the said sum of $164.48. The judgment makes no provision for the arrest and imprisonment of the defendant, and under its present form no body execution could (section 251, Municipal Court Act [Laws 1902, c. 580]), and none should, be issued.

To that end, therefore, the pleadings are amended to conform to the proof, and the judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The complaint in this action was oral and the claim “conversion.” It was conceded upon the trial that, if the plaintiffs were entitled to recover anything, it was the sum of $164.48, for which sum judgment was rendered. An examination of the record discloses that the plaintiffs failed to prove any conversion of the goods received by the defendant, but proved sufficient to enable them under the concession of record to recover the said sum of $164.48. The judgment makes no provision for the arrest and imprisonment of the defendant, and under its present form no body execution could (section 251, Municipal Court Act [Laws 1902, c. 580]), and none should, be issued.

To that end, therefore, the pleadings are amended to conform to the proof, and the judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 N.Y.S. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-lundberg-nyappterm-1912.