Cohen v. Lopez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cohen v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 550 F.3d 1202
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2008·No. 07-56337·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: RUDY A. LOPEZ,  Debtor,

No. 07-56337

BAP No.

AMRANE COHEN, Appellant,  CC-06-01359-

MkBPa

v.

ORDER

RUDY A. LOPEZ, Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Pappas, Brandt, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Argued and Submitted

December 11, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed December 24, 2008

Before: John T. Noonan, Barry G. Silverman and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Linda S. Conway, Orange, California, for the trusteeappellant .

Bruce D. White, White & Roseman, Newport Beach, California , for the debtor-appellee.

16699

16700 IN RE LOPEZ ORDER

Trustee Amrane Cohen appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s decision affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order confirming Rudy Lopez’s Chapter 13 plan. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291 and we adopt as our own the well-reasoned published opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, In re Lopez, 372 B.R. 40 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Lopez, (9th Cir. 2008).

Cohen v. Lopez (Cohen v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Lopez (In Re Lopez)
372 B.R. 40 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)