Cohen v. Leeds
929 So. 2d 26, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4415, 2006 WL 784764
This text of 929 So. 2d 26 (Cohen v. Leeds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cohen v. Leeds, 929 So. 2d 26, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4415, 2006 WL 784764 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Miller v. Greene, 104 So.2d 457 (Fla.1958)(holding that quantum meruit recovery is proper where one furnishes services to another, which are of benefit to the recipient, under an invalid or unenforceable contract).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Miller v. Greene
104 So. 2d 457 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 26, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4415, 2006 WL 784764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-leeds-fladistctapp-2006.