Cohen v. Koehler

New York Court of Appeals

Cohen v. Koehler

631 N.E.2d 113, 82 N.Y.2d 882, 609 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4358

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 21, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 631 N.E.2d 113 (Cohen v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Koehler, 631 N.E.2d 113, 82 N.Y.2d 882, 609 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4358 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of Supreme Court and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

Petitioner, a probationary Correction Captain, could have been demoted to Correction Officer without a hearing unless he established that the demotion was for an improper reason or in bad faith (see, Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649, 650; Matter of York v McGuire, 99 AD2d 1023, 1024, affd 63 NY2d 760). Respondent Department of Correction presented evidence that petitioner had failed to inspect roll call, had failed to respond to a breach of security, had disobeyed a direct order to transfer prisoners in response to the breach, and had sexually harassed a subordinate, supporting the conclusion that petitioner’s performance was unsatisfactory and the demotion was in good faith. On this record, we agree with the dissenting Justices at the Appellate Division that the [885]*885purported evidence of bad faith failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine concur in memorandum.

Judgment of Supreme Court and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of Supreme Court and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

Petitioner, a probationary Correction Captain, could have been demoted to Correction Officer without a hearing unless he established that the demotion was for an improper reason or in bad faith (see, Matter of Johnson v Katz, 68 NY2d 649, 650; Matter of York v McGuire, 99 AD2d 1023, 1024, affd 63 NY2d 760). Respondent Department of Correction presented evidence that petitioner had failed to inspect roll call, had failed to respond to a breach of security, had disobeyed a direct order to transfer prisoners in response to the breach, and had sexually harassed a subordinate, supporting the conclusion that petitioner’s performance was unsatisfactory and the demotion was in good faith. On this record, we agree with the dissenting Justices at the Appellate Division that the [885]*885purported evidence of bad faith failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine concur in memorandum.

Judgment of Supreme Court and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

631 N.E.2d 113, 82 N.Y.2d 882, 609 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 4358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-koehler-ny-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack