Cohen v. Koegler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Koegler

263 A.D. 1062, 35 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8050

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1062 (Cohen v. Koegler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Koegler, 263 A.D. 1062, 35 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal of the order of the Special Term and the order of the Buffalo City Court and denial of the motion in the Buffalo City Court on the grounds (1) that there is shown no consideration for the alleged compromise and (2) that the court had no power or jurisdiction to entertain or make disposition of the motion. (Buffalo City Court Act [Laws of 1909, chap. 570], § 20, as amd.) (The order affirms an order of the Buffalo City Court canceling and satisfying a default judgment taken against defendant.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal of the order of the Special Term and the order of the Buffalo City Court and denial of the motion in the Buffalo City Court on the grounds (1) that there is shown no consideration for the alleged compromise and (2) that the court had no power or jurisdiction to entertain or make disposition of the motion. (Buffalo City Court Act [Laws of 1909, chap. 570], § 20, as amd.) (The order affirms an order of the Buffalo City Court canceling and satisfying a default judgment taken against defendant.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1062, 35 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-koegler-nyappdiv-1942.