Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co.

284 A.D. 1050, 135 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order on reargument as denied their motion for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical and surgical expenses incidental thereto, and for loss of services. Order insofar as appealed from modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ denied in all respects ” and by substituting therefor the word “ granted ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. There was a sufficient showing of indigence and special circumstances to warrant the granting of the motion in the interests of justice and denial thereof was an improvident use of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co., 284 A.D. 1050, 135 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

284 A.D. 1050 (Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanley v. Byrne Bros.
2 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)