Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co.

284 A.D. 1050, 135 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 13, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 284 A.D. 1050 (Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. King Toys & Stationery Co., 284 A.D. 1050, 135 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order on reargument as denied their motion for a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical and surgical expenses incidental thereto, and for loss of services. Order insofar as appealed from modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ denied in all respects ” and by substituting therefor the word “ granted ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. There was a sufficient showing of indigence and special circumstances to warrant the granting of the motion in the interests of justice and denial thereof was an improvident use of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanley v. Byrne Bros.
2 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D. 1050, 135 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-king-toys-stationery-co-nyappdiv-1954.