Cohen v. Kafer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Cohen v. Kafer

36 A.2d 421, 131 N.J.L. 328, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 202

DecidedMarch 23, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 36 A.2d 421 (Cohen v. Kafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Kafer, 36 A.2d 421, 131 N.J.L. 328, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

*329 Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in a workman’s compensation case. The case as presented is purely one of fact. There being testimony to support the finding of the Supreme Court, this court will not weigh the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter for the Supreme Court.

For uffirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*329 Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in a workman’s compensation case. The case as presented is purely one of fact. There being testimony to support the finding of the Supreme Court, this court will not weigh the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Porter for the Supreme Court.

For uffirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bobine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.2d 421, 131 N.J.L. 328, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-kafer-nj-1944.