Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cohen v. Jordan Services, Inc.

Cohen v. Jordan Services, Inc.

49 A.D.3d 680, 852 N.Y.2d 851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 680 (Cohen v. Jordan Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Jordan Services, Inc., 49 A.D.3d 680, 852 N.Y.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[681]*681The plaintiff failed to conclusively establish that the evidence was willfully destroyed or discarded in order to frustrate her interests. Accordingly, the extreme sanction of preclusion is not warranted (see Vaughn v City of New York, 201 AD2d 556, 558 [1994]).

In view of our determination, we do not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Covello and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lipco Electrical Corp. v. ASG Consulting Corp.
117 A.D.3d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Berkoski Oil Co.
58 A.D.3d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Scarano v. Bribitzer
56 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 680, 852 N.Y.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-jordan-services-inc-nyappdiv-2008.