Cohen v. Jonathan Levi Co.
This text of 242 A.D. 725 (Cohen v. Jonathan Levi Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Summary judgment affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., McNamee and Crapser, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Heffeman, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial upon the ground that the terms of the lease are ambiguous and that the intent of the parties is a question of fact and that under this lease defendant is at liberty to introduce extraneous evidence to show the intent of the parties. (Dealy v. Klapp, 199 App. Div. 150.) [150 Misc. 565.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-jonathan-levi-co-nyappdiv-1934.