Cohen v. Herzog

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Herzog

130 A.D.2d 351, 514 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46358

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 351 (Cohen v. Herzog) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Herzog, 130 A.D.2d 351, 514 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on July 2, 1986, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $1,200,000 and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record herein, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on July 2, 1986, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $1,200,000 and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed without costs and without disbursements.

After review of the record herein, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 351, 514 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-herzog-nyappdiv-1987.