Cohen v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Herman

13 A.D.2d 893, 215 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10987

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 893 (Cohen v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Herman, 13 A.D.2d 893, 215 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The order appealed from denying petitioner’s application for an order prohibiting respondent from promulgating an order abolishing rent controls in the City of Rochester was entered on May 3,1961. Thereafter and on the same day an order was made by respondent terminating such controls. This action was taken prior to the granting of a further stay by a Justice of this court. Although the order appealed from became academic by such administrative action of respondent we have considered the merits of the appeal. The order of Special Term was correct and should be affirmed. Application for a stay denied as academic. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying writ of prohibition and vacating the stay.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The order appealed from denying petitioner’s application for an order prohibiting respondent from promulgating an order abolishing rent controls in the City of Rochester was entered on May 3,1961. Thereafter and on the same day an order was made by respondent terminating such controls. This action was taken prior to the granting of a further stay by a Justice of this court. Although the order appealed from became academic by such administrative action of respondent we have considered the merits of the appeal. The order of Special Term was correct and should be affirmed. Application for a stay denied as academic. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying writ of prohibition and vacating the stay.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 893, 215 N.Y.S.2d 318, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-herman-nyappdiv-1961.