Cohen v. Henderson Justice Court

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * MICHAEL R. COHEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01708-RFB-EJY Plaintiff, v. HENDERSON JUSTICE COURT, et al., Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) of the Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on September 19, 2024. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by October 3, 2024. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. /// /// IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against the Henderson Justice Court, Clark County District Attorney’s Office, and Clark County Public Defender’s Office be ° DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED: October 21, 2024 AS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

_2-