Cohen v. Harper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Harper

160 A.D. 874

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1913·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The words were not slanderous per se (Torres v. Huner, 150 App. Div. 798), and the innuendo was without force. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The words were not slanderous per se (Torres v. Huner, 150 App. Div. 798), and the innuendo was without force. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cohen v. Harper, 160 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

160 A.D. 874 (Cohen v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related