Cohen v. Harper

144 N.Y.S. 1110

This text of 144 N.Y.S. 1110 (Cohen v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Harper, 144 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The words were not slanderous per se (Torres v. Huner, 150 App. Div. 798, 135 N. Y. Supp. 332), and the innuendo was without force. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Torres v. Huner
150 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-harper-nyappdiv-1913.