Cohen v. Grossman

185 A.D.2d 719

This text of 185 A.D.2d 719 (Cohen v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Grossman, 185 A.D.2d 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Memorandum: The time to appeal does not begin to run until the appellant is served with the order or judgment appealed from together with "written notice of its entry” (CPLR 5513 [a]). Defendant Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company cannot rely upon substantial compliance with the requirement of a written notice of entry by showing that appellant received oral notice. A party seeking to limit the time of his adversary to appeal is held to strict practice (Good v Daland, 119 NY 153, 155-156; Moses v Penney Co., 135 AD2d 1147). Present— Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Fallon and Doerr, JJ. (Entered July 6, 1992.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Good v. . Daland
23 N.E. 474 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Moses v. J. C. Penney Co.
135 A.D.2d 1147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1992.