Cohen v. Gratz

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Cohen v. Gratz

6 F. Cas. 16, 3 Wall. Jr. 379

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 F. Cas. 16 (Cohen v. Gratz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Gratz, 6 F. Cas. 16, 3 Wall. Jr. 379 (circtedpa 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIER, Circuit Justice.

In hearing the motion for a new trial of this issue, the court will confine itself to the question, whether the verdict of the jury is in conformity with the weight of evidence, and the law, on the particular issue submitted. The motion must be disposed of, and the verdict either confirmed or a new verdict taken and confirmed, before the court will hear the whole merits.

[For a case in the supreme court of the United States, reversing a decree of the circuit court for the eastern district of Pennsylvania, for an accounting and conveyance by the executors of Simon Grate, see Grate’s Ex’rs v. Cohen, 11 How. (52 U. S.) 1.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIER, Circuit Justice.

In hearing the motion for a new trial of this issue, the court will confine itself to the question, whether the verdict of the jury is in conformity with the weight of evidence, and the law, on the particular issue submitted. The motion must be disposed of, and the verdict either confirmed or a new verdict taken and confirmed, before the court will hear the whole merits.

[For a case in the supreme court of the United States, reversing a decree of the circuit court for the eastern district of Pennsylvania, for an accounting and conveyance by the executors of Simon Grate, see Grate’s Ex’rs v. Cohen, 11 How. (52 U. S.) 1.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F. Cas. 16, 3 Wall. Jr. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-gratz-circtedpa-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack