Cohen v. Grainger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Grainger

224 A.D.2d 418, 638 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 418 (Cohen v. Grainger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cohen v. Grainger, 224 A.D.2d 418, 638 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475 to enforce an attorney’s lien, the petitioner appeals on the ground of inadequacy from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated January 12, 1995, which is in his favor and against the respondents in the principal sum of $7,853.92.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly followed the remittitur instructions of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell (81 NY2d 655), when it determined the appellant’s fee. The Supreme Court properly calculated the appellant’s fee in accordance with those instructions, and the amount awarded to the appellant was reasonable in all respects. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475 to enforce an attorney’s lien, the petitioner appeals on the ground of inadequacy from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated January 12, 1995, which is in his favor and against the respondents in the principal sum of $7,853.92.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly followed the remittitur instructions of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell (81 NY2d 655), when it determined the appellant’s fee. The Supreme Court properly calculated the appellant’s fee in accordance with those instructions, and the amount awarded to the appellant was reasonable in all respects. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 418, 638 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-grainger-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack