Cohen v. Grainger

224 A.D.2d 418, 638 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 902
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475 to enforce an attorney’s lien, the petitioner appeals on the ground of inadequacy from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated January 12, 1995, which is in his favor and against the respondents in the principal sum of $7,853.92.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly followed the remittitur instructions of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell (81 NY2d 655), when it determined the appellant’s fee. The Supreme Court properly calculated the appellant’s fee in accordance with those instructions, and the amount awarded to the appellant was reasonable in all respects. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Grainger, 224 A.D.2d 418, 638 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 418 (Cohen v. Grainger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moody v. Sorokina
50 A.D.3d 1522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ruiz v. Jawonio, Inc.
29 A.D.3d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)