Cohen v. Grainger

179 A.D.2d 808, 578 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836

This text of 179 A.D.2d 808 (Cohen v. Grainger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. Grainger, 179 A.D.2d 808, 578 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

[809]*809The petitioner, an attorney discharged by his client prior to the termination of a lawsuit, failed to establish his entitlement to compensation on a contingent fee basis (cf., Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454). However, based on our independent review of the record, we conclude that the amount of counsel fees awarded to the petitioner on a quantum meruit basis of actual work performed was inadequate. We have therefore modified the award to the extent indicated (see, Jordan v Freeman, 40 AD2d 656). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.
539 N.E.2d 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Jordan v. Freeman
40 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 808, 578 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-grainger-nyappdiv-1992.