Cohen v. Goldberger

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cohen v. Goldberger. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 Ohio St. 22
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1923·No. No. 17707·Published

Opinion

MATTHIAS, J.

1. The right of an attorney to payment of fees earned in the prosecution of litigation to judgment, though usually denominated a lien, rests on the leiquity of such attorney to be paid out of the judgment by him obtained and is upheld on the theory that his services and skill created the fund.

2. Such claim, together with costs and other expenses of procuring the judgment, has priority over those of general creditors of the plaintiff, and under the facts in this case is superior to those of general creditors of a partnership of which plaintiff was a member who seek to obtain the proceeds of such judgment as assets of the partnership.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Goldberger, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861 (Ohio 1923).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 861 (Cohen v. Goldberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.