Cohen v. Gellers

15 A.D.2d 954, 226 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798

Opinion

[955] It was error for the trial court to direct judgment in favor of the

plaintiff solely on the ground that the defendant failed to establish her affirmative defense by a fair preponderance of the evidence. Irrespective of the defense interposed by the defendant, the burden was upon the plaintiff to establish her cause of action by a fair preponderance of the evidence (cf. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Siefke, 144 N. Y. 354, 359; Whitlatch v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of N. Y., 149 N. Y. 45, 50-51; Matter of Tipple, 118 Misc. 430). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Gellers, 15 A.D.2d 954, 226 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

15 A.D.2d 954 (Cohen v. Gellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Siefke
39 N.E. 358 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.
43 N.E. 405 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
In re Tipple
118 Misc. 430 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1922)