Cohen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cohen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd.

212 A.D. 884

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The provision of the policy insuring plaintiff against “ any loss by reason of the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries * * * accidentally sustained during tho policy period by any person,” has relation to causes of action for damages that arise in favor of the injured person against the assured. The facts stated in the complaint give rise to no cause of action in favor of the injured person, and the liability of the assured does not arise from a claim of damages but from a contract express or implied of the plaintiff (the assured) to pay for the care and treatment -of his son. Further, the insurer is liable only when the assured is liable for damages, and no facts are alleged that would make the assured so liable. For all that appears the accident was unavoidable. The promise alleged in the complaint is without consideration. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The provision of the policy insuring plaintiff against “ any loss by reason of the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries * * * accidentally sustained during tho policy period by any person,” has relation to causes of action for damages that arise in favor of the injured person against the assured. The facts stated in the complaint give rise to no cause of action in favor of the injured person, and the liability of the assured does not arise from a claim of damages but from a contract express or implied of the plaintiff (the assured) to pay for the care and treatment -of his son. Further, the insurer is liable only when the assured is liable for damages, and no facts are alleged that would make the assured so liable. For all that appears the accident was unavoidable. The promise alleged in the complaint is without consideration. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.

Cohen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd., 212 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

212 A.D. 884 (Cohen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related