Cohen v. DISCIPLINARY BD., ETC.
430 A.2d 1151, 494 Pa. 129
Opinion
Walter W. COHEN, Consumer Advocate, et al., Appellants,
v.
The DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF the SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
*130 Walter W. Cohen, Consumer Advocate, Daniel Clearfield, Asst. Consumer Advocate, Harrisburg, for appellants.
Allen B. Zerfoss, Harrisburg, Charles W. Johns, Howland W. Abramson, Philadelphia, for appellees.
Before ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY and KAUFFMAN, JJ.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
O'BRIEN, C.J., and WILKINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cohen v. DISCIPLINARY BD., ETC., 430 A.2d 1151, 494 Pa. 129 (Pa. 1981).
430 A.2d 1151 (Cohen v. DISCIPLINARY BD., ETC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.