Cohen v. Department of Housing Preservation & Development

246 A.D.2d 393, 666 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 252

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), entered on or about July 2, 1997, which, in a proceeding to annul re[394] spondent agency’s denial of petitioner’s appeal of respondent middle income housing corporation’s denial of petitioner’s application for succession rights to an apartment, granted respondent agency’s motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly held that petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of receipt raised by respondent agency’s proof of mailing some 14 months before commencement of this proceeding (see, Woodner Co. v Higgins, 179 AD2d 444, lv denied 80 NY2d 756). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. Department of Housing Preservation & Development, 246 A.D.2d 393, 666 N.Y.S.2d 429, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

246 A.D.2d 393 (Cohen v. Department of Housing Preservation & Development) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Higgins
179 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)