Cohen v. Dana
This text of 264 A.D. 721 (Cohen v. Dana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument of the appeal from the order dated February 5, 1941 [262 App. Div. 42], denying appellants’ motion to require plaintiff to bring in as a party defendant The Fisk Rubber Corporation, referred to the court which rendered the decision. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ. Reargument granted and upon reargument the order is reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion is granted, without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiff pursuing any steps he may be advised to take. (Cohen v. Dana, 287 N. Y. 405.) Defendants’ time to answer the complaint or otherwise move with respect thereto is extended until twenty days after the corporation shall have been joined as a party defendant. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 858.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 721, 34 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-dana-nyappdiv-1942.